CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHonda Prelude vs Mazda CX-80
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Honda Prelude vs Mazda CX-80

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHondaMazda
Price (RRP)$65,000$64,490
Power110kW209kW
0-100 km/h9s
Fuel Economy4.3 L/100km7.1 L/100km
Boot Space281L550L
Towing2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Honda Prelude starts from $65,000 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-80 opens at $64,490. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $510.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $71,500 and $70,939 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Honda Prelude by roughly $3,990 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Honda Prelude and Mazda CX-80 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Honda Prelude and 6 in the Mazda CX-80.

Feature Showdown

The Honda Prelude features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-80 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Honda Prelude stands out with wireless charging, Bose audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-80. The Mazda CX-80 counters with power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Honda Prelude uses a Inline 4 producing 110kW and 182Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda CX-80 responds with a Petrol making 209kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Honda Prelude measures 4,693mm long on a 2,735mm wheelbase, 297mm shorter than the Mazda CX-80 at 4,990mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 281L in the Honda Prelude and 550L in the Mazda CX-80, giving the Mazda CX-80 a 269L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 11.8m

Honda Prelude e:HEV
11.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.8m
Best
Honda Prelude
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-80
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,226/year for the Honda Prelude and $2,024/year for the Mazda CX-80. That is a $798 annual difference in favour of the Honda Prelude.

Estimated annual total: $1,226 (Honda Prelude) vs $2,024 (Mazda CX-80). The Honda Prelude saves you roughly $798 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Honda Prelude) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Honda Prelude if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-80 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Honda Prelude will save you roughly $798 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-80 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · All SUVs