CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-80 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$64,490$58,900
Power209kW120kW
0-100 km/h9s9.1s
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km6.2 L/100km
Boot Space258L435L
Towing2,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz GLA opens at $58,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz GLA the more affordable entry point by $5,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $64,790 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz GLA by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes-Benz GLA hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 96% for the Mercedes-Benz GLA.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 7 in the Mercedes-Benz GLA.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz GLA gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-80 stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz GLA. The Mercedes-Benz GLA counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz GLA offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the Mercedes-Benz GLA.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz GLA responds with a Petrol making 120kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-80 is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 579mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz GLA at 4,411mm (2,729mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 435L in the Mercedes-Benz GLA, giving the Mercedes-Benz GLA a 177L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.6m

Mercedes-Benz GLA GLA200
11.0mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.6m
Worst
Mazda CX-80
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz GLA
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $1,767/year for the Mercedes-Benz GLA. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz GLA.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $1,767 (Mercedes-Benz GLA). The Mercedes-Benz GLA saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz GLA). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz GLA if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes-Benz GLA trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mercedes-Benz GLA will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz GLA has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes-Benz GLA?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA is the cheapest at $58,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $5,590.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes-Benz GLA all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA has the largest boot at 435L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Mazda CX-80 is quickest to 100km/h in 9s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs