CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes-Benz GLB
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes-Benz GLB

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 1 Oct 2026, price 1 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Mazda CX-80D50e Pure10?02
Mercedes-Benz GLBGLB 220 4MATIC6?06

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Mercedes-Benz GLB: we're still completing price, length, width, height and wheelbase, plus 8 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$56,100TBC
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$56,100RRP

  • no option data for this car

No price

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power187kW140kW
0-100 km/h9s7.5s
Fuel Economy5.2 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)258L—
Towing2,000kg—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mazda CX-80 & Mercedes-Benz GLB

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Mazda CX-80

  • REC-006434 · published 15 Sep 2025Due to a software programming issue of the Body Control Module (BCM), the instrument cluster fuel level may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2025

Mercedes-Benz GLB

  • REC-006695 · published 12 Aug 2026Nine model lines: door lock defect (campaign RC5219)Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2026
  • REC-006158 · published 6 Nov 2024The tyres within this production range may not meet manufacturing specifications which may lead to deflation of the tyre.Year range on the notice: 2024
  • REC-005949 · published 15 Apr 2024The electrical power steering control unit back-up software may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2024
  • 8 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-80 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Mercedes-Benz GLB. The Mercedes-Benz GLB counters with Apple CarPlay, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz GLB offers black artico man-made leather.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Diesel producing 187kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB lines up making 140kW, paired to a 8g-edct dual clutch transmission, 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 187kW vs 140kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mercedes-Benz GLB is 1.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m diameter

Average

Mazda CX-80 D50e Pure
11.8m
←
Mazda CX-80 D50e Pure
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Mazda CX-80 Turning circle · Ø 11.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.2 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz GLB if: You or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Mazda CX-80: Top CarSorted Score, 79 vs 53

The Mazda CX-80 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (79 vs 53), taking 1 of 2 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Mazda CX-80 ahead by 59), value (Mazda CX-80 ahead by 30), safety (Mazda CX-80 ahead by 29). The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes-Benz GLB?

The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $56,100 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Mazda CX-80 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mercedes-Benz GLB, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 187kW. The Mercedes-Benz GLB is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars