Mazda CX-80 vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid

The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid opens at $49,550. That makes the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $14,940.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $54,505 respectively.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-80, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $11,610 in fuel alone.

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, Sony audio and ambient lighting that the Mazda CX-80 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid responds with a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol making 225kW and 450Nm, paired to a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) driving the front wheels.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 225kW vs 209kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 190mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid at 4,800mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 143L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid, giving the Mazda CX-80 a 115L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $72/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. That is a $2,322 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $72 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $2,322 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid).