Mazda CX-80 vs BMW X1
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the BMW X1 opens at $61,800. That makes the BMW X1 the more affordable entry point by $2,690.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $67,980 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW X1 by roughly $2,705 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-80 and BMW X1 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 86% for the BMW X1.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-80 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the BMW X1.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 6 in the BMW X1.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the BMW X1 gets a 10.7-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-80 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the BMW X1. The BMW X1 counters with Apple CarPlay, head-up display, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the BMW X1 offers sensatec synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the BMW X1.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The BMW X1 responds with a Petrol making 115kW and 230Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 115kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW X1 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 490mm longer than the BMW X1 at 4,500mm (2,692mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 410L in the BMW X1, giving the BMW X1 a 152L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.3m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $1,853/year for the BMW X1. That is a $541 annual difference in favour of the BMW X1.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $1,853 (BMW X1). The BMW X1 saves you roughly $541 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X1). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the BMW X1 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The BMW X1 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BMW X1 will save you roughly $541 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW X1 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and BMW X1?
The BMW X1 is the cheapest at $61,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $2,690.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BMW X1 uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and BMW X1 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The BMW X1 has the largest boot at 410L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The BMW X1 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.1s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
