Mazda CX-80 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Mazda CX-80
From $64,490
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
209kW
8.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
258L

Jeep Grand Cherokee
From $65,950
SUV
Petrol
Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS
210kW
9.9 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
1067L
Track the Mazda CX-80 & Jeep Grand Cherokee
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee opens at $65,950. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $1,460.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $72,545 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-80 by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee gets a 10.1-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee counters with heated front seats that the Mazda CX-80 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee responds with a Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS making 210kW and 344Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic w/ paddle shifters driving the rear wheels.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 209kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 76mm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee at 4,914mm (2,964mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 1067L in the Jeep Grand Cherokee, giving the Jeep Grand Cherokee a 809L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Jeep Grand Cherokee leads with a 2,813kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 313kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $2,822/year for the Jeep Grand Cherokee. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-80.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $2,822 (Jeep Grand Cherokee). The Mazda CX-80 saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Grand Cherokee). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Jeep Grand Cherokee if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Jeep Grand Cherokee takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-80 will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Jeep Grand Cherokee has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Jeep Grand Cherokee?
The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $64,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Jeep Grand Cherokee by $1,460.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 8.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee has the largest boot at 1067L.
Which can tow the most?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,813kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee makes the most power at 210kW.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!







