CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW M2 vs Audi TTS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW M2 vs Audi TTS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Audi TTS: we're still completing length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 6 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBMWAudi
Price (RRP)$123,900$95,100
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power353kW200kW
0-100 km/h4.2s5.2s
Fuel Economy9.6 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Boot Space390L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BMW M2 & Audi TTS

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW M2 starts from $123,900 before on-road costs, while the Audi TTS opens at $95,100. That makes the Audi TTS the more affordable entry point by $28,800.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $136,290 and $104,610 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi TTS by roughly $2,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW M2 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio — features our data doesn't list for the Audi TTS. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BMW M2 uses a Petrol producing 353kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.2 seconds.

The Audi TTS responds with a 2.0-litre 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol (TFSI) making 200kW and 350Nm, paired to a s tronic 6-speed dual-clutch gearbox driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.2 seconds.

The BMW M2 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 200kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BMW M2 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m diameter

Good

BMW M2 Coupe Auto
11.0m
BMW M2 Coupe Auto
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
BMW M2 Turning circle · Ø 11.0 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,736/year for the BMW M2 and $2,252/year for the Audi TTS. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Audi TTS.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW M2 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi TTS if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The BMW M2 and Audi TTS trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Audi TTS will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW M2 and Audi TTS?

The Audi TTS is the cheapest at $95,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW M2 by $28,800.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi TTS uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BMW M2 and Audi TTS carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M2 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M2 makes the most power at 353kW. The BMW M2 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars