CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi TTS vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi TTS vs Toyota LandCruiser 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Audi TTS: we're still completing length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 6 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecAudiToyota
Price (RRP)$95,100$97,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power200kW227kW
0-100 km/h5.2s8.6s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km8.9 L/100km
Boot Space700L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Audi TTS & Toyota LandCruiser 300

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi TTS starts from $95,100 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 opens at $97,990. That makes the Audi TTS the more affordable entry point by $2,890.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $104,610 and $107,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi TTS by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Audi TTS uses a 2.0-litre 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol (TFSI) producing 200kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a s tronic 6-speed dual-clutch gearbox to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.2 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 200kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Audi TTS is 3.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m diameter

Average

Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Toyota LandCruiser 300 Turning circle · Ø 11.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

2.0 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Audi TTS and $2,537/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Audi TTS.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi TTS if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi TTS takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi TTS will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi TTS and Toyota LandCruiser 300?

The Audi TTS is the cheapest at $95,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 300 by $2,890.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi TTS uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Toyota LandCruiser 300 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Audi TTS, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW. The Audi TTS is quickest to 100km/h in 5.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best mid-size SUVs