CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW M3 vs Toyota Aurion
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW M3 vs Toyota Aurion

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWToyota
Price (RRP)$163,700TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power353kW200kW
0-100 km/h4.2s
Fuel Economy10.1 L/100km9.3 L/100km
Boot Space480L515L
Towing1,800kg1,600kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the BMW M3 & Toyota Aurion

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW M3 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota Aurion. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BMW M3 uses a Petrol producing 353kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.2 seconds.

The Toyota Aurion responds with a 2GR-FE 3.5L V6 petrol making 200kW and 336Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels.

The BMW M3 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 200kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW M3 measures 4,801mm long on a 2,857mm wheelbase, 34mm shorter than the Toyota Aurion at 4,835mm (2,775mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 480L in the BMW M3 and 515L in the Toyota Aurion, giving the Toyota Aurion a 35L advantage.

For towing, the BMW M3 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.0m

TightestBMW M3 Sedan ManualTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW M3 Sedan Manual
11.0mTighter
Best
Toyota Aurion AT-X
11.0m
Best
BMW M3 Sedan Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Aurion AT-X
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW M3Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW M3Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Aurion11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,879/year for the BMW M3 and $2,651/year for the Toyota Aurion. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Aurion.

Estimated annual total: $2,879 (BMW M3) vs $2,651 (Toyota Aurion). The Toyota Aurion saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M3) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Toyota Aurion). The BMW M3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW M3 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Aurion if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW M3 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota Aurion will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota Aurion has a clear edge. The BMW M3 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW M3 and Toyota Aurion?

The BMW M3 is the cheapest at $163,700 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Aurion uses the least fuel at 9.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota Aurion all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota Aurion has the largest boot at 515L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW M3 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M3 makes the most power at 353kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars