CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW M4 vs Audi S5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW M4 vs Audi S5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWAudi
Price (RRP)$168,700$99,900
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power353kW270kW
0-100 km/h4.2s4.5s
Fuel Economy10.1 L/100km7.1 L/100km
Boot Space440L445L
Towing1,800kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the BMW M4 & Audi S5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW M4 starts from $168,700 before on-road costs, while the Audi S5 opens at $99,900. That makes the Audi S5 the more affordable entry point by $68,800.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $185,570 and $109,890 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi S5 by roughly $4,275 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BMW M4 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Audi S5 gets a 14.5-inch display and 11.9-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW M4 stands out with heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio — features our data doesn't list for the Audi S5. The Audi S5 counters with power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW M4 gets merino leather upholstery while the Audi S5 offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the BMW M4 and 3-zone in the Audi S5.

Drivetrain

The BMW M4 uses a Petrol producing 353kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.2 seconds.

The Audi S5 responds with a Petrol MHEV making 270kW and 550Nm, paired to a s tronic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.5 seconds.

The BMW M4 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 270kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BMW M4 is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW M4 measures 4,801mm long on a 2,857mm wheelbase, 28mm shorter than the Audi S5 at 4,829mm (2,892mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Audi S5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the BMW M4 and 445L in the Audi S5, giving the Audi S5 a 5L advantage. The Audi S5 seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the Audi S5 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.4m

TightestBMW M4 Coupe ManualTightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4mTighter
Best
Audi S5 S5 edition one Sedan
11.4m
Best
BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi S5 edition one Sedan
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW M4Tightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW M4Tightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Audi S511.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,879/year for the BMW M4 and $2,024/year for the Audi S5. That is a $855 annual difference in favour of the Audi S5.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M4) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi S5). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW M4 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi S5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi S5 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi S5 will save you roughly $855 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW M4 and Audi S5?

The Audi S5 is the cheapest at $99,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW M4 by $68,800.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi S5 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Audi S5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for BMW M4, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi S5 has the largest boot at 445L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M4 makes the most power at 353kW. The BMW M4 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars