BMW M4 vs Toyota 86
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Toyota 86: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h, turning circle and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the BMW M4 & Toyota 86
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The BMW M4 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota 86 gets a 6.1-inch display.
The BMW M4 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota 86. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The BMW M4 uses a Petrol producing 353kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.2 seconds.
The Toyota 86 lines up making 147kW and 205Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the rear wheels.
The BMW M4 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 147kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The BMW M4 measures 4,801mm long on a 2,857mm wheelbase, 546mm longer than the Toyota 86 at 4,255mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M4 generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m diameter
Average
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,879/year for the BMW M4 and $2,024/year for the Toyota 86. That is a $855 annual difference in favour of the Toyota 86.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M4) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Toyota 86). The BMW M4 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —3yr (Toyota 86).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BMW M4 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota 86 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The BMW M4 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Toyota 86 will save you roughly $855 a year in fuel. The BMW M4 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, BMW M4 and Toyota 86?
The BMW M4 is the cheapest at $168,700 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota 86 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Toyota 86 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for BMW M4, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The BMW M4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The BMW M4 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The BMW M4 makes the most power at 353kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
