CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBYD Shark 6 vs Kia Tasman
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Shark 6 vs Kia Tasman

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBYDKia
Price (RRP)$55,900$38,990
Range (WLTP)100km
Battery29.6 kWh
Power321kW154kW
0-100 km/h5.7s12.5s
Fuel Economy7.9 kWh/100km (as hybrid)7.4 L/100km
Boot Space352L
Towing2,500kg3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LYes (6.6kW)No

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Price Breakdown

The BYD Shark 6 starts from $55,900 before on-road costs, while the Kia Tasman opens at $38,990. That makes the Kia Tasman the more affordable entry point by $16,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,490 and $42,889 respectively.

The BYD Shark 6 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Kia Tasman, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Shark 6 by roughly $8,650 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the BYD Shark 6 and Kia Tasman hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the BYD Shark 6 and 85% for the Kia Tasman.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Kia Tasman packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the BYD Shark 6.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Shark 6 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Kia Tasman gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD Shark 6 stands out with Apple CarPlay and V2L that you will not find on the Kia Tasman. The Kia Tasman counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BYD Shark 6 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Kia Tasman offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The BYD Shark 6 uses a Hybrid producing 321kW and 650Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.7 seconds.

The Kia Tasman responds with a Diesel making 154kW and 440Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.5 seconds.

The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 154kW. In the real-world sprint, the BYD Shark 6 is 6.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Shark 6 measures 5,457mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 47mm longer than the Kia Tasman at 5,410mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Tasman generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Kia Tasman leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 13.5m

Kia Tasman S 4x2
11.0mTighter
Best
BYD Shark 6 Dynamic Cab-Chassis
13.5m
Worst
BYD Shark 6
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia Tasman
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $379/year for the BYD Shark 6 and $2,109/year for the Kia Tasman. That is a $1,730 annual difference in favour of the BYD Shark 6.

Estimated annual total: $379 (BYD Shark 6) vs $2,109 (Kia Tasman). The BYD Shark 6 saves you roughly $1,730 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Tasman). The Kia Tasman has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Tasman if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Tasman takes 5 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BYD Shark 6 will save you roughly $1,730 a year in fuel. The Kia Tasman adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Shark 6 and Kia Tasman?

The Kia Tasman is the cheapest at $38,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BYD Shark 6 by $16,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BYD Shark 6 uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — BYD Shark 6 and Kia Tasman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Tasman has the largest boot at 352L.

Which can tow the most?

The Kia Tasman has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Tasman has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Shark 6 makes the most power at 321kW. The BYD Shark 6 is quickest to 100km/h in 5.7s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes