CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBYD Shark 6 vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Shark 6 vs Mitsubishi Triton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBYDMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$55,900$43,690
Range (WLTP)100km
Battery29.6 kWh
Power321kW150kW
0-100 km/h11.3s
Fuel Economy2 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Towing2,500kg3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The BYD Shark 6 starts from $55,900 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Triton opens at $43,690. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $12,210.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,490 and $48,059 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Shark 6 by roughly $7,695 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the BYD Shark 6 and Mitsubishi Triton hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the BYD Shark 6 and 86% for the Mitsubishi Triton.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mitsubishi Triton packs more ADAS features with 1 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the BYD Shark 6.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Shark 6 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The BYD Shark 6 uses a Hybrid producing 321kW and 650Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Shark 6 measures 5,457mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 137mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Shark 6 generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m diameter

Large

Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4m
Mitsubishi Triton
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $570/year for the BYD Shark 6 and $2,109/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $1,539 annual difference in favour of the BYD Shark 6.

Estimated annual total: $570 (BYD Shark 6) vs $2,109 (Mitsubishi Triton). The BYD Shark 6 saves you roughly $1,539 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Triton takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BYD Shark 6 will save you roughly $1,539 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes