CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Isuzu D-Max vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu D-Max vs Mitsubishi Triton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 27 Sep 2026, price 13 Aug 2026

SpecIsuzuMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$41,243$43,690
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW150kW
0-100 km/h—11.3s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Isuzu D-Max & Mitsubishi Triton

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu D-Max starts from $41,243 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Triton opens at $43,690. That makes the Isuzu D-Max the more affordable entry point by $2,447.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $45,367 and $48,059 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu D-Max and Mitsubishi Triton hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Isuzu D-Max and 86% for the Mitsubishi Triton.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 4 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Isuzu D-Max and 7 in the Mitsubishi Triton.

Recalls on our record

Isuzu D-Max

  • REC-006053 · published 8 Aug 2024The fuel delivery hose may have been installed incorrectly and come into contact with the engine oil level gauge bracket resulting in premature wear.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2023
  • REC-006052 · published 8 Aug 2024Due to a software issue, the Engine Control Module (ECM) may incorrectly reduce the engine speed.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2024
  • REC-005842 · published 28 Nov 2023Due to a manufacturing issue, the fuel hose may chafe against the engine oil level bracket and become damaged.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2023
  • 5 more on the model page.

Mitsubishi Triton

  • REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
  • REC-001049 · published 6 May 2019The rivets for the side step cover may corrode and fracture, especially if usage involves exposure to salt or anti-freeze agent.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
  • REC-001032 · published 29 Jun 2016The turn signal and lighting switch connector terminals may become worn during switch operation due to insufficient rigidity.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • 3 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu D-Max features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu D-Max uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Triton has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu D-Max measures 5,340mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 20mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Triton generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 12.5m

TightestMitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2Tightest turn at 12.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4mTighter
Best
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5m
Worst
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi TritonTightest turn at 12.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu D-Max12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Mitsubishi TritonTightest12.4 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Isuzu D-Max and $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu D-Max.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu D-Max) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu D-Max if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Isuzu D-Max: Top CarSorted Score, 70 vs 66

The Isuzu D-Max comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (70 vs 66), taking 2 of 4 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: safety (Isuzu D-Max ahead by 15), fuel economy (Isuzu D-Max ahead by 6), value (Isuzu D-Max ahead by 4). The Isuzu D-Max will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu D-Max and Mitsubishi Triton?

The Isuzu D-Max is the cheapest at $41,243 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Triton by $2,447.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu D-Max uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Isuzu D-Max and Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu D-Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Triton makes the most power at 150kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia