CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu D-Max vs Mazda BT-50
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu D-Max vs Mazda BT-50

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuMazda
Price (RRP)$41,243$36,400
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW120kW
0-100 km/h10.5s10.9s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Isuzu D-Max & Mazda BT-50

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu D-Max starts from $41,243 before on-road costs, while the Mazda BT-50 opens at $36,400. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $4,843.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $45,367 and $40,040 respectively.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu D-Max and Mazda BT-50 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Isuzu D-Max and 86% for the Mazda BT-50.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 4 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Isuzu D-Max and 6 in the Mazda BT-50.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu D-Max features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda BT-50 gets a 7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu D-Max uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Isuzu D-Max is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu D-Max measures 5,340mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 20mm longer than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase).

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 12.5m

TightestIsuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2Tightest turn at 12.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5mTighter
Best
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m
Best
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestIsuzu D-MaxTightest turn at 12.5m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu D-MaxTightest12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Mazda BT-5012.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Isuzu D-Max and $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Isuzu D-Max) vs $1,967 (Mazda BT-50). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu D-Max) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). The Isuzu D-Max has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu D-Max if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu D-Max takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Isuzu D-Max adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu D-Max and Mazda BT-50?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Isuzu D-Max by $4,843.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu D-Max uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu D-Max and Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu D-Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu D-Max has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia