Mitsubishi Triton vs KGM Musso
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Mitsubishi Triton & KGM Musso
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mitsubishi Triton starts from $43,690 before on-road costs, while the KGM Musso opens at $40,500. That makes the KGM Musso the more affordable entry point by $3,190.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,059 and $44,550 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Triton by roughly $1,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Triton features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Musso counters with ambient lighting that the Mitsubishi Triton does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Triton gets cloth upholstery while the KGM Musso offers leather.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.
The KGM Musso responds with a Turbo DDi Diesel making 133kW and 400Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Triton has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 133kW. In the real-world sprint, the KGM Musso is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 215mm longer than the KGM Musso at 5,105mm (3,000mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Triton generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the KGM Musso leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.2m to 12.4m
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $2,451/year for the KGM Musso. That is a $313 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.
Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Mitsubishi Triton) vs $2,451 (KGM Musso). The Mitsubishi Triton saves you roughly $313 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the KGM Musso if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Triton takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $313 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and KGM Musso?
The KGM Musso is the cheapest at $40,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Triton by $3,190.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi Triton makes the most power at 150kW. The KGM Musso is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
