KGM Musso vs Kia Tasman
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the KGM Musso & Kia Tasman
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The KGM Musso starts from $40,500 before on-road costs, while the Kia Tasman opens at $42,990. That makes the KGM Musso the more affordable entry point by $2,490.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $44,550 and $47,289 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Kia Tasman by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The KGM Musso features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Kia Tasman gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Musso stands out with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Kia Tasman. The Kia Tasman counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso gets leather upholstery while the Kia Tasman offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the KGM Musso and 2-zone in the Kia Tasman.
Drivetrain
The KGM Musso uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 133kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Kia Tasman responds with a Diesel making 154kW and 440Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.5 seconds.
The Kia Tasman has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 133kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the KGM Musso is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The KGM Musso measures 5,105mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 305mm shorter than the Kia Tasman at 5,410mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Tasman generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 532L in the KGM Musso and 352L in the Kia Tasman, giving the KGM Musso a 180L advantage.
For towing, the Kia Tasman leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.2m to 12.3m
Based on 12.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,451/year for the KGM Musso and $2,109/year for the Kia Tasman. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Kia Tasman.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Tasman). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the KGM Musso if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Kia Tasman if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The KGM Musso takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Kia Tasman will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Musso has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, KGM Musso and Kia Tasman?
The KGM Musso is the cheapest at $40,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia Tasman by $2,490.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Kia Tasman uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Kia Tasman holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Musso, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The KGM Musso has the largest boot at 532L.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Kia Tasman makes the most power at 154kW. The KGM Musso is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
