CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Cannon vs KGM Musso
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Cannon vs KGM Musso

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMKGM
Price (RRP)$39,490$40,500
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW133kW
0-100 km/h10.5s10.9s
Fuel Economy8.3 L/100km8.6 L/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing3,200kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the GWM Cannon & KGM Musso

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GWM Cannon starts from $39,490 before on-road costs, while the KGM Musso opens at $40,500. That makes the GWM Cannon the more affordable entry point by $1,010.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,439 and $44,550 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Cannon features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Cannon stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the KGM Musso. The KGM Musso counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GWM Cannon gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Musso offers leather.

Drivetrain

The GWM Cannon uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The KGM Musso responds with a Turbo DDi Diesel making 133kW and 400Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso has the clear power advantage at 133kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Cannon is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Cannon measures 5,416mm long on a 3,230mm wheelbase, 311mm longer than the KGM Musso at 5,105mm (3,000mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Cannon generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the KGM Musso leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 13.0m

TightestKGM Musso ELXTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso ELX
12.2mTighter
Best
GWM Cannon Premium
13.0m
Worst
GWM Cannon Premium
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso ELX
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM MussoTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
GWM Cannon13.0 m
Large△ 3-point
KGM MussoTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,366/year for the GWM Cannon and $2,451/year for the KGM Musso. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the GWM Cannon.

Estimated annual total: $2,366 (GWM Cannon) vs $2,451 (KGM Musso). The GWM Cannon saves you roughly $85 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Cannon) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Cannon if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The GWM Cannon and KGM Musso trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The GWM Cannon will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Cannon and KGM Musso?

The GWM Cannon is the cheapest at $39,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Musso by $1,010.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Cannon uses the least fuel at 8.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Cannon all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Musso has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso makes the most power at 133kW. The GWM Cannon is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia