CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›KGM Musso vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$75,600
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power133kW150kW
0-100 km/h10.9s12s
Fuel Economy8.6 L/100km10.6 L/100km
Boot Space532L—
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the KGM Musso & Toyota LandCruiser 70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The KGM Musso stands out with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso gets leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 133kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 133kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the KGM Musso is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso measures 5,105mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 240mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 12.6m

TightestKGM Musso ELXTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso ELX
12.2mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m
Worst
KGM Musso ELX
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM MussoTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM MussoTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Toyota LandCruiser 7012.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,451/year for the KGM Musso and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the KGM Musso.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The KGM Musso has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The KGM Musso will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The KGM Musso adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Musso and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The KGM Musso uses the least fuel at 8.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of KGM Musso and Toyota LandCruiser 70 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 makes the most power at 150kW. The KGM Musso is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Wagons · Best utes in Australia · Best family cars