CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz C-Class vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz C-Class vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzToyota
Price (RRP)$76,900$75,600
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power150kW150kW
0-100 km/h7.3s12s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km10.6 L/100km
Boot Space455L
Towing1,800kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mercedes-Benz C-Class & Toyota LandCruiser 70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class starts from $76,900 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $75,600. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 70 the more affordable entry point by $1,300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,590 and $83,160 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz C-Class by roughly $5,270 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class features a 11.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz C-Class gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class uses a Petrol producing 150kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class is 4.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class measures 4,751mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 114mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz C-Class generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 12.6m

TightestMercedes-Benz C-Class C200Tightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mercedes-Benz C-Class C200
11.1mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz C-Class C200
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMercedes-Benz C-ClassTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz C-ClassTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Toyota LandCruiser 7012.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $1,054 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz C-Class.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Mercedes-Benz C-Class) vs $3,021 (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Mercedes-Benz C-Class saves you roughly $1,054 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz C-Class) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz C-Class if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class and Toyota LandCruiser 70 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class will save you roughly $1,054 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz C-Class and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz C-Class by $1,300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz C-Class all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · All Wagons · Best hybrid cars · Best family cars