CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW X2 vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW X2 vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWToyota
Price (RRP)$75,900$75,600
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power150kW150kW
0-100 km/h7.4s12s
Fuel Economy7.5 L/100km10.6 L/100km
Boot Space560L
Towing1,800kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BMW X2 & Toyota LandCruiser 70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW X2 starts from $75,900 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $75,600. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 70 the more affordable entry point by $300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $83,490 and $83,160 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW X2 by roughly $4,415 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BMW X2 features a 10.7-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The BMW X2 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW X2 gets sensatec synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the BMW X2 and 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Drivetrain

The BMW X2 uses a Petrol producing 150kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the BMW X2 is 4.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW X2 measures 4,554mm long on a 2,692mm wheelbase, 311mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.3m to 12.6m

TightestBMW X2 xDrive20i M SportTightest turn at 11.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW X2 xDrive20i M Sport
11.3mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m
Worst
BMW X2 xDrive20i M Sport
11.3m · Average

Based on 11.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW X2Tightest turn at 11.3m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW X2Tightest11.3 m
Average△ 3-point
Toyota LandCruiser 7012.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the BMW X2 and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $883 annual difference in favour of the BMW X2.

Estimated annual total: $2,138 (BMW X2) vs $3,021 (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The BMW X2 saves you roughly $883 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X2) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW X2 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The BMW X2 and Toyota LandCruiser 70 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The BMW X2 will save you roughly $883 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW X2 and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW X2 by $300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW X2 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BMW X2 and Toyota LandCruiser 70 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Wagons · Best mid-size SUVs · Best family cars