Toyota LandCruiser 70 vs Volvo XC60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 18 Oct 2026, price 6 Sep 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$75,600RRP
- no option data for this car
$74,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Toyota LandCruiser 70 & Volvo XC60
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 starts from $75,600 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC60 opens at $74,990. That makes the Volvo XC60 the more affordable entry point by $610.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $83,160 and $82,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC60 by roughly $4,275 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Toyota LandCruiser 70
- REC-005079 · published 5 Jul 2016The front fender bracket may fail causing the front fender to become loose.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
Volvo XC60
- REC-006368 · published 23 Jun 2025Due to a software issue, there is a risk that the vehicle’s braking performance may be temporarily disabled if the car has been coasting downhill for at least 1 minute and 30 seconds in ‘B’ mode (in the plug-in hybrid cars) or One Pedal Drive (in the pure electric cars).Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2025
- REC-006319 · published 2 Apr 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the cell modules installed in the high voltage battery may be defective.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2021
- REC-006168 · published 8 Nov 2024Due to a manufacturing defect, the brake pedal rod may not have been fastened to the specified torque and could detach.Year range on the notice: 2020
- 30 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 features a 6.7-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC60 gets a 11.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.
The Volvo XC60 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets cloth upholstery while the Volvo XC60 offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and 2-zone in the Volvo XC60.
Drivetrain
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.
The Volvo XC60 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.9 seconds.
The Volvo XC60 has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 150kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volvo XC60 is 5.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 measures 4,865mm long on a 2,730mm wheelbase, 157mm longer than the Volvo XC60 at 4,708mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo XC60 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 12.6m
Based on 12.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and $2,166/year for the Volvo XC60. That is a $855 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC60.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC60). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo XC60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Volvo XC60: Top CarSorted Score, 69 vs 58
The Volvo XC60 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (69 vs 58), taking 4 of 5 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Volvo XC60 ahead by 27), performance (Volvo XC60 ahead by 17), value (Volvo XC60 ahead by 13). The Volvo XC60 will save you roughly $855 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Volvo XC60?
The Volvo XC60 is the cheapest at $74,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $610.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volvo XC60 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Volvo XC60 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Volvo XC60 makes the most power at 183kW. The Volvo XC60 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
