CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota LandCruiser 70 vs Volvo XC60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota LandCruiser 70 vs Volvo XC60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaVolvo
Price (RRP)$75,600$74,990
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power150kW183kW
0-100 km/h12s6.9s
Fuel Economy10.6 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space483L
Towing3,500kg2,400kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Toyota LandCruiser 70 & Volvo XC60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 starts from $75,600 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC60 opens at $74,990. That makes the Volvo XC60 the more affordable entry point by $610.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $83,160 and $82,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC60 by roughly $4,275 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 features a 6.7-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC60 gets a 11.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.

The Volvo XC60 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio that the Toyota LandCruiser 70 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets cloth upholstery while the Volvo XC60 offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and 2-zone in the Volvo XC60.

Drivetrain

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.

The Volvo XC60 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.9 seconds.

The Volvo XC60 has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo XC60 is 5.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 measures 4,865mm long on a 2,730mm wheelbase, 157mm longer than the Volvo XC60 at 4,708mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo XC60 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.6m

TightestVolvo XC60 Plus B5 BrightTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo XC60 Plus B5 Bright
11.0mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m
Worst
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo XC60 Plus B5 Bright
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo XC60Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota LandCruiser 7012.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Volvo XC60Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and $2,166/year for the Volvo XC60. That is a $855 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC60.

Estimated annual total: $3,021 (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs $2,166 (Volvo XC60). The Volvo XC60 saves you roughly $855 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC60). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo XC60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo XC60 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volvo XC60 will save you roughly $855 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Volvo XC60?

The Volvo XC60 is the cheapest at $74,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $610.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC60 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Volvo XC60 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo XC60 makes the most power at 183kW. The Volvo XC60 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.9s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Wagons · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars