Toyota LandCruiser 70 vs Volvo XC60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Toyota LandCruiser 70
From $65,690
Cab Chassis
Diesel
151kW
10.7 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Volvo XC60
From $74,990
SUV
2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5
183kW
7.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
505L
Price Breakdown
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 starts from $65,690 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC60 opens at $74,990. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 70 the more affordable entry point by $9,300.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $72,259 and $82,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC60 by roughly $4,420 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Volvo XC60 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio that the Toyota LandCruiser 70 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses a Diesel producing 151kW and 430Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.
The Volvo XC60 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.
The Volvo XC60 has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 151kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo XC60 is 5.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,085mm wheelbase, 302mm longer than the Volvo XC60 at 4,688mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.1m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,050/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and $2,166/year for the Volvo XC60. That is a $884 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC60.
Estimated annual total: $3,050 (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs $2,166 (Volvo XC60). The Volvo XC60 saves you roughly $884 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC60). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo XC60 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Volvo XC60 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Volvo XC60 will save you roughly $884 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Volvo XC60?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $65,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo XC60 by $9,300.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volvo XC60 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota LandCruiser 70 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volvo XC60 has the largest boot at 505L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Volvo XC60 makes the most power at 183kW. The Volvo XC60 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
