Mazda CX-70 vs Volvo XC60

The Mazda CX-70 starts from $76,720 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC60 opens at $74,990. That makes the Volvo XC60 the more affordable entry point by $1,730.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,392 and $82,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

The Mazda CX-70 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC60 gets a 11.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.

The Mazda CX-70 stands out with Bose audio that you will not find on the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.8 seconds.

The Volvo XC60 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 183kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-70 is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 412mm longer than the Volvo XC60 at 4,708mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 483L in the Volvo XC60, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 115L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70 and $2,166/year for the Volvo XC60. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC60.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mazda CX-70) vs $2,166 (Volvo XC60). The Volvo XC60 saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC60). Both match on warranty length.