CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-70 vs Mazda CX-90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-70 vs Mazda CX-90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaMazda
Price (RRP)$76,720$74,385
Power254kW254kW
0-100 km/h7.8s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km8.2 L/100km
Boot Space598L257L
Towing2,500kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-70 starts from $76,720 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-90 opens at $74,385. That makes the Mazda CX-90 the more affordable entry point by $2,335.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,392 and $81,824 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-70 and Mazda CX-90 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mazda CX-90.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mazda CX-70 and 6 in the Mazda CX-90. The Mazda CX-70 adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-90 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-70 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-90 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments.

The Mazda CX-70 stands out with head-up display and Bose audio that you will not find on the Mazda CX-90. The Mazda CX-90 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The Mazda CX-90 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, matching the Mazda CX-90 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase).

Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 257L in the Mazda CX-90, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 341L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2015L vs 2025L. The Mazda CX-90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-90 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.8m

Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m
Worst
Mazda CX-70
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-90
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70 and $2,337/year for the Mazda CX-90. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-70.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mazda CX-70) vs $2,337 (Mazda CX-90). The Mazda CX-70 saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-90 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-70 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-70 will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-70 and Mazda CX-90?

The Mazda CX-90 is the cheapest at $74,385 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-70 by $2,335.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-70 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-70 and Mazda CX-90 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs