CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ford Ranger vs KGM Musso
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Ranger vs KGM Musso

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 4 Aug 2026, price 1 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Ford RangerXL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis6?42
KGM MussoAdvance XLV9?03

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecFordKGM
Price (RRP)$37,130TBC
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power125kW133kW
0-100 km/h10.5s10.9s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km9 L/100km
Boot (seats up)—532L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Ranger & KGM Musso

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Ford Ranger

  • REC-006705 · published 18 Aug 2026Ranger dual-cab: side curtain airbag may not deploy as intended down the B-pillarYear range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
  • REC-006683 · published 28 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2020
  • REC-006659 · published 13 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
  • 23 more on the model page.

KGM Musso

  • REC-006327 · published 8 Apr 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, under certain driving conditions the engine cooling fan fuse may fail.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2024

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Ranger features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the KGM Musso. The KGM Musso counters with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats, ventilated seats and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Ranger gets cloth upholstery while the KGM Musso offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Ford Ranger and 2-zone in the KGM Musso.

Drivetrain

The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The KGM Musso responds with a Turbo DDi Diesel making 133kW and 420Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso has the clear power advantage at 133kW vs 125kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Ford Ranger is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 190mm shorter than the KGM Musso at 5,415mm (3,110mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the KGM Musso leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 12.9m

TightestKGM Musso Advance XLVTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso Advance XLV
12.2mTighter
Best
Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m
Worst
Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m · Large

Based on 12.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso Advance XLV
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM MussoTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Ranger12.9 m
Large△ 3-point
KGM MussoTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $2,565/year for the KGM Musso. That is a $598 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso). The KGM Musso has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Ford Ranger: Top CarSorted Score, 66 vs 60

The Ford Ranger comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (66 vs 60), taking 2 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Ford Ranger ahead by 19), safety (Ford Ranger ahead by 18), practicality (KGM Musso ahead by 17). The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $598 a year in fuel. The KGM Musso adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and KGM Musso?

The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Ranger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Musso, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso makes the most power at 133kW. The Ford Ranger is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia