KGM Musso vs Mitsubishi Triton
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 4 Aug 2026, price 1 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
No price
- no price to build from against the Mitsubishi Triton
$43,690RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the KGM Musso & Mitsubishi Triton
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
KGM Musso
- REC-006327 · published 8 Apr 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, under certain driving conditions the engine cooling fan fuse may fail.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2024
Mitsubishi Triton
- REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
- REC-001049 · published 6 May 2019The rivets for the side step cover may corrode and fracture, especially if usage involves exposure to salt or anti-freeze agent.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
- REC-001032 · published 29 Jun 2016The turn signal and lighting switch connector terminals may become worn during switch operation due to insufficient rigidity.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- 3 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The KGM Musso features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Musso stands out with heated front seats, ventilated seats and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Triton. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso gets leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Triton offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the KGM Musso and 1-zone in the Mitsubishi Triton.
Drivetrain
The KGM Musso uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 133kW and 420Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Triton has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 133kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the KGM Musso is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The KGM Musso measures 5,415mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 95mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Triton generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.2m to 12.4m
Based on 12.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,565/year for the KGM Musso and $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $427 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the KGM Musso if: You or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Mitsubishi Triton: Top CarSorted Score, 77 vs 68
The Mitsubishi Triton comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (77 vs 68), taking 3 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 27), value (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 18), fuel economy (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 13). The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $427 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, KGM Musso and Mitsubishi Triton?
The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mitsubishi Triton holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Musso, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi Triton makes the most power at 150kW. The KGM Musso is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
