CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Triton vs GWM Cannon Alpha
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Triton vs GWM Cannon Alpha

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiGWM
Price (RRP)$43,690$52,990
Range (WLTP)100km
Battery37.1 kWh
Electric range115km
Power150kW300kW
0-100 km/h11.3s10.5s
Max DC Charge50kW
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km7.9 kWh/100km (as hybrid)
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LNoYes (6kW)

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Triton starts from $43,690 before on-road costs, while the GWM Cannon Alpha opens at $52,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $9,300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,059 and $58,289 respectively.

The GWM Cannon Alpha qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mitsubishi Triton, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Cannon Alpha by roughly $8,650 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mitsubishi Triton and GWM Cannon Alpha hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Cannon Alpha packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Mitsubishi Triton.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Triton and 6 in the GWM Cannon Alpha.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Triton features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GWM Cannon Alpha gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Triton stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the GWM Cannon Alpha. The GWM Cannon Alpha counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Triton gets cloth upholstery while the GWM Cannon Alpha offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Mitsubishi Triton and 2-zone in the GWM Cannon Alpha.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.

The GWM Cannon Alpha responds with a 2.0L 4-cylinder Turbo Petrol Plug-in Hybrid making 300kW and 750Nm, paired to a 9-speed hybrid automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The GWM Cannon Alpha has the clear power advantage at 300kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Cannon Alpha is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 125mm shorter than the GWM Cannon Alpha at 5,445mm (3,350mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Cannon Alpha generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the GWM Cannon Alpha leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 13.0m

Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4mTighter
Best
GWM Cannon Alpha Lux PHEV
13.0m
Worst
Mitsubishi Triton
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Cannon Alpha
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $379/year for the GWM Cannon Alpha. That is a $1,730 annual difference in favour of the GWM Cannon Alpha.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Mitsubishi Triton) vs $379 (GWM Cannon Alpha). The GWM Cannon Alpha saves you roughly $1,730 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Cannon Alpha). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Cannon Alpha if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mitsubishi Triton and GWM Cannon Alpha trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The GWM Cannon Alpha will save you roughly $1,730 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and GWM Cannon Alpha?

The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Cannon Alpha by $9,300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Cannon Alpha uses the least fuel at 1.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton and GWM Cannon Alpha all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Cannon Alpha makes the most power at 300kW. The GWM Cannon Alpha is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes