CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Musso vs LDV T60 MAX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso vs LDV T60 MAX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

KGM Musso
KGM

KGM Musso

From $40,500

Body

Ute

Fuel type

Diesel

Engine

Turbo DDi Diesel

Power

133kW

Economy

8.6 L/100km

Safety

ANCAP: no data

Boot

532L

View full details
LDV T60 MAX
Winner
LDV

LDV T60 MAX

From $36,990

Body

Ute

Fuel type

Diesel

Engine

Diesel Turbo

Power

160kW

Economy

8.1 L/100km

Safety

ANCAP: no data

Boot

View full details
SpecKGMLDV
Price (RRP)$40,500$36,990
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power133kW160kW
0-100 km/h10.9s11.5s
Fuel Economy8.6 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the KGM Musso & LDV T60 MAX

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The KGM Musso starts from $40,500 before on-road costs, while the LDV T60 MAX opens at $36,990. That makes the LDV T60 MAX the more affordable entry point by $3,510.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $44,550 and $40,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the LDV T60 MAX gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Musso stands out with ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the LDV T60 MAX. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso gets leather upholstery while the LDV T60 MAX offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 133kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The LDV T60 MAX responds with a Diesel Turbo making 160kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The LDV T60 MAX has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 133kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the KGM Musso is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso measures 5,105mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 260mm shorter than the LDV T60 MAX at 5,365mm (3,155mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the LDV T60 MAX generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the LDV T60 MAX leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 12.6m

TightestKGM Musso ELXTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso ELX
12.2mTighter
Best
LDV T60 MAX Pro Auto
12.6m
Worst
KGM Musso ELX
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
LDV T60 MAX Pro Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM MussoTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM MussoTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
LDV T60 MAX12.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,451/year for the KGM Musso and $2,309/year for the LDV T60 MAX. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the LDV T60 MAX.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso) vs 7 years / 200,000km (LDV T60 MAX). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso if: You or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the LDV T60 MAX if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer LDV's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The LDV T60 MAX takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The LDV T60 MAX will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Musso and LDV T60 MAX?

The LDV T60 MAX is the cheapest at $36,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Musso by $3,510.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The LDV T60 MAX uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of KGM Musso and LDV T60 MAX carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The LDV T60 MAX makes the most power at 160kW. The KGM Musso is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia