Ford Ranger vs GWM Cannon
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 22 Jul 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
Track the Ford Ranger & GWM Cannon
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Ranger starts from $37,130 before on-road costs, while the GWM Cannon opens at $39,490. That makes the Ford Ranger the more affordable entry point by $2,360.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,843 and $43,439 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Ranger by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Ranger and GWM Cannon hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 84% for the Ford Ranger and 86% for the GWM Cannon.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM Cannon, against 5 on the Ford Ranger.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Ford Ranger and 6 in the GWM Cannon.
Recalls on our record
Ford Ranger
- REC-006705 · published 18 Aug 2026Ranger dual-cab: side curtain airbag may not deploy as intended down the B-pillarYear range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
- REC-006683 · published 28 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2020
- REC-006659 · published 13 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
- 23 more on the model page.
GWM Cannon
- REC-006123 · published 28 Oct 2024During the installation of the diesel fuel filter assembly, the incorrect lubricant type was used on the fuel filter sealing rubber “O-ring”.Year range on the notice: 2023
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Ranger features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the GWM Cannon gets a 14.6-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the GWM Cannon. The GWM Cannon counters with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Ranger gets cloth upholstery while the GWM Cannon offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The GWM Cannon responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels.
The Ford Ranger has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 191mm shorter than the GWM Cannon at 5,416mm (3,230mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Ford Ranger leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.9m to 13.0m
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 13.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $2,366/year for the GWM Cannon. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Cannon). The GWM Cannon has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Cannon if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
GWM Cannon: Level on the CarSorted Score at 66, ahead on the category wins, but the Ford Ranger is $2,360 cheaper
The GWM Cannon comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (66 vs 66), taking 1 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Ford Ranger ahead by 13), practicality (GWM Cannon ahead by 5), performance (GWM Cannon ahead by 5). The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The GWM Cannon adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and GWM Cannon?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Cannon by $2,360.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Ford Ranger and GWM Cannon all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Cannon has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Ranger makes the most power at 125kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
