CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›GWM Cannon vs JAC T9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Cannon vs JAC T9

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 25 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
GWM CannonPremium10?02
JAC T9Oasis 4x411?01

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecGWMJAC
Price (RRP)$39,490$42,662
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW125kW
0-100 km/h—11.5s
Fuel Economy8.3 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Towing3,200kg3,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / No data
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the GWM Cannon & JAC T9

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GWM Cannon starts from $39,490 before on-road costs, while the JAC T9 opens at $42,662. That makes the GWM Cannon the more affordable entry point by $3,172.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,439 and $46,928 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the JAC T9 by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Cannon and JAC T9 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the GWM Cannon and 85% for the JAC T9.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Cannon and 6 in the JAC T9.

Recalls on our record

GWM Cannon

  • REC-006123 · published 28 Oct 2024During the installation of the diesel fuel filter assembly, the incorrect lubricant type was used on the fuel filter sealing rubber “O-ring”.Year range on the notice: 2023

JAC T9

  • REC-006377 · published 8 Jul 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the retaining bolts on the left and right-side curtain airbags may not have been fastened with sufficient torque.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
  • REC-006211 · published 13 Dec 2024Due to the failure of the turbo actuator module, the vehicle may inadvertently activate limp-home mode resulting in a gradual reduction of motive power whilst driving.Year range on the notice: 2024

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Cannon features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the JAC T9 gets a 10.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Cannon stands out with power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the JAC T9. The JAC T9 counters with wireless charging and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GWM Cannon gets synthetic leather upholstery while the JAC T9 offers leather.

Drivetrain

The GWM Cannon uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a 4WD layout.

The JAC T9 responds with a Turbo-diesel making 125kW and 410Nm, paired to a 8at driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The JAC T9 has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Cannon measures 5,416mm long on a 3,230mm wheelbase, 86mm longer than the JAC T9 at 5,330mm (3,110mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Cannon generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the JAC T9 leads with a 3,200kg braked capacity vs 3,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.0m to 13.0m

TightestGWM Cannon PremiumTightest turn at 13.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
GWM Cannon Premium
13.0mTighter
Best
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m
Best
GWM Cannon Premium
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestGWM CannonTightest turn at 13.0m, needs the least road to swing around
GWM CannonTightest13.0 m
Large△ 3-point
JAC T913.0 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,366/year for the GWM Cannon and $2,166/year for the JAC T9. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the JAC T9.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Cannon) vs 7 years (JAC T9). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (JAC T9).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Cannon if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the JAC T9 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

JAC T9: Top CarSorted Score, 69 vs 66, but the GWM Cannon is $3,172 cheaper

The JAC T9 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (69 vs 66), taking 2 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: technology (JAC T9 ahead by 13), performance (GWM Cannon ahead by 11), safety (JAC T9 ahead by 6). The JAC T9 will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Cannon and JAC T9?

The GWM Cannon is the cheapest at $39,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the JAC T9 by $3,172.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The JAC T9 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: GWM Cannon and JAC T9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Cannon has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The JAC T9 makes the most power at 125kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia