GWM Cannon vs JAC T9
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the GWM Cannon & JAC T9
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Cannon starts from $39,490 before on-road costs, while the JAC T9 opens at $42,662. That makes the GWM Cannon the more affordable entry point by $3,172.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,439 and $46,928 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the JAC T9 by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Cannon and JAC T9 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the GWM Cannon and 85% for the JAC T9.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Cannon and 6 in the JAC T9.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Cannon features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the JAC T9 gets a 10.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Cannon stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the JAC T9. The JAC T9 counters with wireless charging and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GWM Cannon gets synthetic leather upholstery while the JAC T9 offers leather.
Drivetrain
The GWM Cannon uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The JAC T9 responds with a Turbo-diesel making 125kW and 410Nm, paired to a 8at driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The JAC T9 has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Cannon is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Cannon measures 5,416mm long on a 3,230mm wheelbase, 86mm longer than the JAC T9 at 5,330mm (3,110mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Cannon generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the JAC T9 leads with a 3,200kg braked capacity vs 3,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
13.0m to 13.0m
Based on 13.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 13.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,366/year for the GWM Cannon and $2,166/year for the JAC T9. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the JAC T9.
Estimated annual total: $2,366 (GWM Cannon) vs $2,166 (JAC T9). The JAC T9 saves you roughly $200 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Cannon) vs 7 years (JAC T9). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (JAC T9).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Cannon if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the JAC T9 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The GWM Cannon and JAC T9 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The JAC T9 will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Cannon and JAC T9?
The GWM Cannon is the cheapest at $39,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the JAC T9 by $3,172.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The JAC T9 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — GWM Cannon and JAC T9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Cannon has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,200kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The JAC T9 makes the most power at 125kW. The GWM Cannon is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
