CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJAC T9 vs Nissan Navara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

JAC T9 vs Nissan Navara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJACNissan
Price (RRP)$42,662$26,490
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power125kW122kW
0-100 km/h11.5s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km9.9 L/100km
Towing3,200kg1,588kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the JAC T9 & Nissan Navara

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The JAC T9 starts from $42,662 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Navara opens at $26,490. That makes the Nissan Navara the more affordable entry point by $16,172.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,928 and $29,139 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the JAC T9 by roughly $3,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the JAC T9 and Nissan Navara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The JAC T9 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Nissan Navara.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 6 in the JAC T9 and 7 in the Nissan Navara.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The JAC T9 stands out with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Nissan Navara. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The JAC T9 uses a Turbo-diesel producing 125kW and 410Nm of torque, sent through a 8at to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The Nissan Navara lines up making 122kW and 238Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual (7-speed automatic optional) driving the rear wheels.

The JAC T9 has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 122kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The JAC T9 measures 5,330mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 75mm longer than the Nissan Navara at 5,255mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan Navara generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the JAC T9 leads with a 3,200kg braked capacity vs 1,588kg. That 1,612kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 13.0m

TightestNissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2Tightest turn at 11.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2
11.8mTighter
Best
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m
Worst
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan NavaraTightest turn at 11.8m, needs the least road to swing around
JAC T913.0 m
Large△ 3-point
Nissan NavaraTightest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the JAC T9 and $2,822/year for the Nissan Navara. That is a $656 annual difference in favour of the JAC T9.

Estimated annual total: $2,166 (JAC T9) vs $2,822 (Nissan Navara). The JAC T9 saves you roughly $656 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (JAC T9) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Nissan Navara). The JAC T9 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC T9)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the JAC T9 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan Navara if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The JAC T9 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The JAC T9 will save you roughly $656 a year in fuel. The JAC T9 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, JAC T9 and Nissan Navara?

The Nissan Navara is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the JAC T9 by $16,172.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The JAC T9 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — JAC T9 and Nissan Navara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The JAC T9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The JAC T9 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The JAC T9 makes the most power at 125kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia