Ford Ranger vs Nissan Navara
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Ford Ranger & Nissan Navara
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Ranger starts from $37,130 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Navara opens at $47,990. That makes the Ford Ranger the more affordable entry point by $10,860.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,843 and $52,789 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Ranger by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Ranger features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Nissan Navara gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Nissan Navara. The Nissan Navara counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Nissan Navara responds with a Diesel making 140kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.
The Nissan Navara has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 125kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Ford Ranger is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 35mm shorter than the Nissan Navara at 5,260mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Nissan Navara leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.5m to 12.9m
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $2,252/year for the Nissan Navara. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Navara). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Nissan Navara if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Ranger takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and Nissan Navara?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan Navara by $10,860.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Ranger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Nissan Navara, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Nissan Navara makes the most power at 140kW. The Ford Ranger is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
