JAC T9 vs Mazda BT-50
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the JAC T9 & Mazda BT-50
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The JAC T9 starts from $42,662 before on-road costs, while the Mazda BT-50 opens at $36,400. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $6,262.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,928 and $40,040 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the JAC T9 and Mazda BT-50 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the JAC T9 and 86% for the Mazda BT-50.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the JAC T9, against 4 on the Mazda BT-50.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the JAC T9 and 6 in the Mazda BT-50.
Feature Showdown
The JAC T9 features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda BT-50 gets a 7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The JAC T9 stands out with wireless charging and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda BT-50. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the JAC T9 gets leather upholstery while the Mazda BT-50 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The JAC T9 uses a Turbo-diesel producing 125kW and 410Nm of torque, sent through a 8at to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.
The JAC T9 has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The JAC T9 measures 5,330mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 10mm longer than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda BT-50 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.5m to 13.0m
Based on 13.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the JAC T9 and $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.
Warranty: 7 years (JAC T9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). The JAC T9 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC T9)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the JAC T9 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda BT-50 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. The JAC T9 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, JAC T9 and Mazda BT-50?
The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the JAC T9 by $6,262.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: JAC T9 and Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The JAC T9 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The JAC T9 makes the most power at 125kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
