CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Foton Tunland vs JAC T9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Foton Tunland vs JAC T9

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 25 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Foton TunlandV7-C 4x28?04
JAC T9Oasis 4x411?01

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecFotonJAC
Price (RRP)$39,990$42,662
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$39,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

$42,662RRP

  • with the Foton Tunland's standard kit: $42,662 (nothing to add)

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW125kW
0-100 km/h11s11.5s
10-80% Charge Time45 min—
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,200kg
Warranty7yr / No data7yr / No data
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Foton Tunland & JAC T9

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Foton Tunland starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the JAC T9 opens at $42,662. That makes the Foton Tunland the more affordable entry point by $2,672.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $46,928 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Foton Tunland

None open on our record

JAC T9

  • REC-006377 · published 8 Jul 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the retaining bolts on the left and right-side curtain airbags may not have been fastened with sufficient torque.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
  • REC-006211 · published 13 Dec 2024Due to the failure of the turbo actuator module, the vehicle may inadvertently activate limp-home mode resulting in a gradual reduction of motive power whilst driving.Year range on the notice: 2024

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Foton Tunland features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the JAC T9 gets a 10.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The JAC T9 counters with wireless charging and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Foton Tunland gets leatherette upholstery while the JAC T9 offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Foton Tunland uses a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid producing 120kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The JAC T9 responds with a Turbo-diesel making 125kW and 410Nm, paired to a 8at driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The JAC T9 has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Foton Tunland is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Foton Tunland measures 5,617mm long on a 3,355mm wheelbase, 287mm longer than the JAC T9 at 5,330mm (3,110mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Foton Tunland leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.0m to 13.5m

TightestJAC T9 Oasis 4x4Tightest turn at 13.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0mTighter
Best
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m
Worst
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
JAC T9 Oasis 4x4
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestJAC T9Tightest turn at 13.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Foton Tunland13.5 m
Large△ 3-point
JAC T9Tightest13.0 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Foton Tunland and $2,166/year for the JAC T9. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the JAC T9.

Warranty: 7 years (Foton Tunland) vs 7 years (JAC T9). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Foton Tunland) / 7yr (JAC T9).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Foton Tunland if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the JAC T9 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

JAC T9: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 71, but the Foton Tunland is $2,672 cheaper

The JAC T9 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 71), taking 2 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (JAC T9 ahead by 25), practicality (Foton Tunland ahead by 5), fuel economy (JAC T9 ahead by 4). The JAC T9 will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Foton Tunland and JAC T9?

The Foton Tunland is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the JAC T9 by $2,672.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The JAC T9 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

JAC T9 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Foton Tunland, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Foton Tunland has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The JAC T9 makes the most power at 125kW. The Foton Tunland is quickest to 100km/h in 11s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia