CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›BYD Shark 6 vs KGM Musso EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Shark 6 vs KGM Musso EV

Two electric Utes go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 22 Aug 2026, price 5 Aug 2026

SpecBYDKGM
Price (RRP)$55,900$60,000
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)100km420km
Battery29.6 kWh80.6 kWh
Electric range100km—
Power321kW152kW
0-100 km/h—10.9s
Max DC Charge55kW300kW
10-80% Charge Time—36 min
Fuel Economy7.9 kWh/100km (as hybrid)—
Boot (seats up)—532L
Towing2,500kg1,800kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LYes (6.6kW)Yes

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the BYD Shark 6 & KGM Musso EV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BYD Shark 6 starts from $55,900 before on-road costs, while the KGM Musso EV opens at $60,000. That makes the BYD Shark 6 the more affordable entry point by $4,100.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,490 and $66,000 respectively.

The KGM Musso EV currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The BYD Shark 6 does not: plug-in hybrids lost the fbt exemption on 1 april 2025.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

29.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

28 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 55kW · 0–80%

32 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 55kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

80.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 17m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

16 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Shark 6 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso EV gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD Shark 6 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and Dynaudio audio — features our data doesn't list for the KGM Musso EV. The KGM Musso EV counters with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats, ventilated seats and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BYD Shark 6 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Musso EV offers leather.

Drivetrain

The BYD Shark 6 uses a Hybrid producing 321kW and 650Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The KGM Musso EV responds with a Electric making 152kW and 339Nm, paired to a 1-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 152kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 29.6kWh (BYD Shark 6) vs 80.6kWh (KGM Musso EV), giving WLTP ranges of 100km and 420km. DC fast charging peaks at 55kW (BYD Shark 6) vs 300kW (KGM Musso EV).

Space & Comfort

The BYD Shark 6 measures 5,413mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 253mm longer than the KGM Musso EV at 5,160mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Shark 6 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the BYD Shark 6 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 13.5m

TightestKGM Musso EV 2WDTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2mTighter
Best
BYD Shark 6 Dynamic Cab-Chassis
13.5m
Worst
BYD Shark 6 Dynamic Cab-Chassis
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM Musso EVTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
BYD Shark 613.5 m
Large△ 3-point
KGM Musso EVTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV). The KGM Musso EV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso EV takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The KGM Musso EV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Shark 6 and KGM Musso EV?

The BYD Shark 6 is the cheapest at $55,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Musso EV by $4,100.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BYD Shark 6 uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

BYD Shark 6 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Musso EV, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The BYD Shark 6 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso EV has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Shark 6 makes the most power at 321kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia