CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda CX-60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The CUPRA Terramar starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $750.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $48,664 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the CUPRA Terramar by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the CUPRA Terramar and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the CUPRA Terramar and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Terramar packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-60.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the CUPRA Terramar and 6 in the Mazda CX-60. The CUPRA Terramar adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-60 misses.
Feature Showdown
The CUPRA Terramar features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The CUPRA Terramar stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The CUPRA Terramar uses a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 lines up making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The CUPRA Terramar measures 4,519mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 226mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,745mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 508L in the CUPRA Terramar and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 62L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the CUPRA Terramar and $1,910/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Terramar.
Estimated annual total: $1,625 (CUPRA Terramar) vs $1,910 (Mazda CX-60). The CUPRA Terramar saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years (CUPRA Terramar) vs 5 years (Mazda CX-60). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the CUPRA Terramar if: You want lower running costs, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-60 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The CUPRA Terramar will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (18 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 18 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!