CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFiat 500 vs Kia pro_cee'd
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Fiat 500 vs Kia pro_cee'd

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Kia pro_cee'd: we're still completing 0-100km/h, drive type and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFiatKia
Price (RRP)$28,900$29,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power51kW150kW
0-100 km/h12.9s
Fuel Economy4.8 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space185L380L
Warranty3yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Fiat 500 & Kia pro_cee'd

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Fiat 500 starts from $28,900 before on-road costs, while the Kia pro_cee'd opens at $29,990. That makes the Fiat 500 the more affordable entry point by $1,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,790 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Fiat 500 by roughly $3,705 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Fiat 500 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Kia pro_cee'd. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Fiat 500 uses a MultiAir Petrol producing 51kW and 102Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed dualogic automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.9 seconds.

The Kia pro_cee'd responds with a 1.6L T-GDi Turbo Petrol making 150kW and 265Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual.

The Kia pro_cee'd has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 51kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Fiat 500 measures 3,571mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 739mm shorter than the Kia pro_cee'd at 4,310mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia pro_cee'd generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Fiat 500 and 380L in the Kia pro_cee'd, giving the Kia pro_cee'd a 195L advantage. The Kia pro_cee'd seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.6m

TightestFiat 500 DolcevitaTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Fiat 500 Dolcevita
9.3mTighter
Best
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m
Worst
Fiat 500 Dolcevita
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFiat 500Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Fiat 500Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Kia pro_cee'd10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,368/year for the Fiat 500 and $2,109/year for the Kia pro_cee'd. That is a $741 annual difference in favour of the Fiat 500.

Estimated annual total: $1,368 (Fiat 500) vs $2,109 (Kia pro_cee'd). The Fiat 500 saves you roughly $741 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Fiat 500) vs 7 years (Kia pro_cee'd). The Kia pro_cee'd has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Fiat 500 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Fiat's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia pro_cee'd if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia pro_cee'd takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Fiat 500 will save you roughly $741 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia pro_cee'd has a clear edge. The Kia pro_cee'd adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Fiat 500 and Kia pro_cee'd?

The Fiat 500 is the cheapest at $28,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia pro_cee'd by $1,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Fiat 500 uses the least fuel at 4.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Fiat 500 and Kia pro_cee'd carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia pro_cee'd has the largest boot at 380L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia pro_cee'd has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia pro_cee'd makes the most power at 150kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars