CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia pro_cee'd vs Toyota Yaris
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia pro_cee'd vs Toyota Yaris

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Kia pro_cee'd: we're still completing 0-100km/h, drive type and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecKiaToyota
Price (RRP)$29,990$28,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power150kW85kW
0-100 km/h10.2s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km3.5 L/100km
Boot Space380L270L
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Kia pro_cee'd & Toyota Yaris

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Kia pro_cee'd starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Yaris opens at $28,990. That makes the Toyota Yaris the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $31,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota Yaris by roughly $5,555 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Yaris counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Kia pro_cee'd does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia pro_cee'd uses a 1.6L T-GDi Turbo Petrol producing 150kW and 265Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to the wheels.

The Toyota Yaris responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 120Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Kia pro_cee'd has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 85kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia pro_cee'd measures 4,310mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 360mm longer than the Toyota Yaris at 3,950mm (2,550mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia pro_cee'd generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 380L in the Kia pro_cee'd and 270L in the Toyota Yaris, giving the Kia pro_cee'd a 110L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 10.6m

TightestToyota Yaris Ascent SportTightest turn at 10.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota Yaris Ascent Sport
10.2mTighter
Best
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m
Worst
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Yaris Ascent Sport
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota YarisTightest turn at 10.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia pro_cee'd10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota YarisTightest10.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Kia pro_cee'd and $998/year for the Toyota Yaris. That is a $1,111 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Yaris.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Kia pro_cee'd) vs $998 (Toyota Yaris). The Toyota Yaris saves you roughly $1,111 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Kia pro_cee'd) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Yaris). The Kia pro_cee'd has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia pro_cee'd if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Yaris if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia pro_cee'd takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota Yaris will save you roughly $1,111 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia pro_cee'd has a clear edge. The Kia pro_cee'd adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia pro_cee'd and Toyota Yaris?

The Toyota Yaris is the cheapest at $28,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia pro_cee'd by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Yaris uses the least fuel at 3.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota Yaris all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia pro_cee'd has the largest boot at 380L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia pro_cee'd has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia pro_cee'd makes the most power at 150kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars