CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFiat 500C vs Mazda MX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Fiat 500C vs Mazda MX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Fiat 500C: we're still completing price, warranty, ground clearance and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFiatMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$41,520
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power63kW135kW
0-100 km/h11s6.5s
Fuel Economy4 L/100km6.8 L/100km
Boot Space182L130L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Fiat 500C & Mazda MX-5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda MX-5 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Fiat 500C lines up producing 63kW and 145Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Mazda MX-5 responds with a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol (Skyactiv-G) making 135kW and 205Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual (skyactiv-mt) driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.5 seconds.

The Mazda MX-5 has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 63kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda MX-5 is 4.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Fiat 500C measures 3,546mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 369mm shorter than the Mazda MX-5 at 3,915mm (2,310mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda MX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 182L in the Fiat 500C and 130L in the Mazda MX-5, giving the Fiat 500C a 52L advantage. The Fiat 500C seats 4 vs 2.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 9.4m

TightestFiat 500C Lounge 0.9 TwinAir ManualTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Fiat 500C Lounge 0.9 TwinAir Manual
9.3mTighter
Best
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4m
Worst
Fiat 500C Lounge 0.9 TwinAir Manual
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFiat 500CTightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Fiat 500CTightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Mazda MX-59.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,140/year for the Fiat 500C and $1,938/year for the Mazda MX-5. That is a $798 annual difference in favour of the Fiat 500C.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Fiat 500C if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Fiat's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda MX-5 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Fiat 500C and Mazda MX-5 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Fiat 500C will save you roughly $798 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Fiat 500C has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Fiat 500C and Mazda MX-5?

The Mazda MX-5 is the cheapest at $41,520 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Fiat 500C uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Fiat 500C and Mazda MX-5 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Fiat 500C has the largest boot at 182L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda MX-5 makes the most power at 135kW. The Mazda MX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · Best family cars