CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda MX-5 vs Peugeot 2008
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda MX-5 vs Peugeot 2008

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaPeugeot
Price (RRP)$41,520$42,490
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power135kW107kW
0-100 km/h6.5s8.3s
Fuel Economy6.8 L/100km4.4 L/100km
Boot Space130L434L
Towing1,100kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mazda MX-5 & Peugeot 2008

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda MX-5 starts from $41,520 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 2008 opens at $42,490. That makes the Mazda MX-5 the more affordable entry point by $970.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $45,672 and $46,739 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 2008 by roughly $3,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda MX-5 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the Peugeot 2008 gets a 10-inch display and 10-inch instruments.

The Peugeot 2008 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and Focal audio that the Mazda MX-5 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda MX-5 lines up producing 135kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.5 seconds.

The Peugeot 2008 responds with a Hybrid making 107kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.3 seconds.

The Mazda MX-5 has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 107kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda MX-5 is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda MX-5 measures 3,915mm long on a 2,310mm wheelbase, 385mm shorter than the Peugeot 2008 at 4,300mm (2,605mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 2008 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 130L in the Mazda MX-5 and 434L in the Peugeot 2008, giving the Peugeot 2008 a 304L advantage. The Peugeot 2008 seats 5 vs 2.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.6m

TightestMazda MX-5 RoadsterTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4mTighter
Best
Peugeot 2008 Allure Hybrid
10.6m
Worst
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Peugeot 2008 Allure Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda MX-5Tightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda MX-5Tightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Peugeot 200810.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,938/year for the Mazda MX-5 and $1,254/year for the Peugeot 2008. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 2008.

Estimated annual total: $1,938 (Mazda MX-5) vs $1,254 (Peugeot 2008). The Peugeot 2008 saves you roughly $684 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda MX-5) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 2008). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda MX-5 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot 2008 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda MX-5 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Peugeot 2008 will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 2008 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda MX-5 and Peugeot 2008?

The Mazda MX-5 is the cheapest at $41,520 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 2008 by $970.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 2008 uses the least fuel at 4.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda MX-5 and Peugeot 2008 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 2008 has the largest boot at 434L.

Which can tow the most?

The Peugeot 2008 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda MX-5 makes the most power at 135kW. The Mazda MX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.5s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars