CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Everest vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordChery
Price (RRP)$59,490$59,990
Range (WLTP)170km
Battery34 kWh
Power154kW315kW
0-100 km/h10.1s7.9s
Fuel Economy7.2 L/100km1.4 L/100km
Boot Space259L620L
Towing3,500kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Ford Everest starts from $59,490 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid opens at $59,990. That makes the Ford Everest the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,439 and $65,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $8,265 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford Everest and Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Ford Everest and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 7 in the Ford Everest.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Ford Everest and 10 in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid adds a 360-degree camera that the Ford Everest misses.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Everest features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid counters with panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Sony audio that the Ford Everest does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel Bi-Turbo producing 154kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid responds with a Plug-in Hybrid making 315kW and 580Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 315kW vs 154kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 178mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid at 4,800mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 620L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid, giving the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid a 361L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 11.8m

Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid Ultimate AWD
11.8m
Best
Ford Everest
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,052/year for the Ford Everest and $399/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. That is a $1,653 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $2,052 (Ford Everest) vs $399 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $1,653 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,653 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs