CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Kuga vs Toyota Fortuner
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Kuga vs Toyota Fortuner

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$53,775
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power134kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.5s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space406L200L
Towing1,600kg3,100kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Kuga & Toyota Fortuner

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Kuga features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Fortuner gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The Toyota Fortuner counters with Apple CarPlay that the Ford Kuga does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Kuga uses a 1.5L GTDi EcoBoost producing 134kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic with sport mode to a AWD layout.

The Toyota Fortuner responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 134kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Kuga measures 4,524mm long on a 2,690mm wheelbase, 271mm shorter than the Toyota Fortuner at 4,795mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Fortuner generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 406L in the Ford Kuga and 200L in the Toyota Fortuner, giving the Ford Kuga a 206L advantage. The Toyota Fortuner seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Fortuner leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.6m

TightestFord Kuga Ambiente 1.5 EcoBoost AWD Auto (2016)Tightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford Kuga Ambiente 1.5 EcoBoost AWD Auto (2016)
11.1mTighter
Best
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m
Worst
Ford Kuga Ambiente 1.5 EcoBoost AWD Auto (2016)
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord KugaTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford KugaTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Toyota Fortuner11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Ford Kuga and $2,166/year for the Toyota Fortuner. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Ford Kuga.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Ford Kuga) vs $2,166 (Toyota Fortuner). The Ford Kuga saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Ford Kuga) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Fortuner). The Toyota Fortuner has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Kuga if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Fortuner if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Fortuner takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Ford Kuga will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford Kuga has a clear edge. The Toyota Fortuner adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Kuga and Toyota Fortuner?

The Toyota Fortuner is the cheapest at $53,775 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Kuga uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Kuga all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Kuga has the largest boot at 406L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota Fortuner has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Fortuner makes the most power at 150kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs