CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Fortuner
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Fortuner

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaToyota
Price (RRP)$54,990$53,775
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power140kW150kW
0-100 km/h7.9s9.5s
Fuel Economy9 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space289L200L
Towing2,300kg3,100kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Skoda Kodiaq & Toyota Fortuner

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Fortuner opens at $53,775. That makes the Toyota Fortuner the more affordable entry point by $1,215.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $59,153 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota Fortuner by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota Fortuner hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq and 95% for the Toyota Fortuner.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Skoda Kodiaq, against 1 on the Toyota Fortuner.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 7 in the Toyota Fortuner.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Fortuner gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Kodiaq stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota Fortuner. The Toyota Fortuner counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the Toyota Fortuner offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the Skoda Kodiaq and 1-zone in the Toyota Fortuner.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 140kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 37mm shorter than the Toyota Fortuner at 4,795mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 289L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 200L in the Toyota Fortuner, giving the Skoda Kodiaq a 89L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2035L vs 1080L.

For towing, the Toyota Fortuner leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 2,300kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.6m

TightestSkoda Kodiaq 140TSI SelectTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Kodiaq 140TSI Select
11.2mTighter
Best
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m
Worst
Skoda Kodiaq 140TSI Select
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda KodiaqTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda KodiaqTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Toyota Fortuner11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,565/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $2,166/year for the Toyota Fortuner. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Fortuner.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Fortuner). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Fortuner if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Fortuner takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota Fortuner will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kodiaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota Fortuner?

The Toyota Fortuner is the cheapest at $53,775 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $1,215.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Fortuner uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota Fortuner all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the largest boot at 289L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Fortuner makes the most power at 150kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs