CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Kona vs Toyota Fortuner
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Kona vs Toyota Fortuner

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiToyota
Price (RRP)$33,700$53,775
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power110kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.9s9.5s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space361L200L
Towing1,300kg3,100kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Track the Hyundai Kona & Toyota Fortuner

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Kona starts from $33,700 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Fortuner opens at $53,775. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $20,075.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,070 and $59,153 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Hyundai Kona by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Toyota Fortuner holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Hyundai Kona. Adult occupant protection scored 80% for the Hyundai Kona and 95% for the Toyota Fortuner.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 4 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Hyundai Kona, against 1 on the Toyota Fortuner.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Hyundai Kona and 7 in the Toyota Fortuner.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Kona features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Fortuner gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Hyundai Kona gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota Fortuner offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Kona uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 110kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Toyota Fortuner is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Kona measures 4,350mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 445mm shorter than the Toyota Fortuner at 4,795mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Fortuner generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 361L in the Hyundai Kona and 200L in the Toyota Fortuner, giving the Hyundai Kona a 161L advantage. The Toyota Fortuner seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Fortuner leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 1,800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.6m

TightestHyundai Kona 2.0 FWDTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6mTighter
Best
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m
Worst
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai KonaTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai KonaTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Fortuner11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona and $2,166/year for the Toyota Fortuner. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai Kona.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Fortuner). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Fortuner if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Fortuner takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Hyundai Kona will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai Kona has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona and Toyota Fortuner?

The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $33,700 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Fortuner by $20,075.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai Kona uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai Kona has the largest boot at 361L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Fortuner makes the most power at 150kW. The Toyota Fortuner is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs