CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Kona vs MG HS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Kona vs MG HS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Hyundai Kona: we're still completing kerb weight, seat count, 0-100km/h and warranty.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecHyundaiMG
Price (RRP)$26,600$33,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power110kW125kW
0-100 km/h9.6s
Fuel Economy6.2 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space374L507L
Towing1,300kg1,500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Hyundai Kona & MG HS

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Kona starts from $26,600 before on-road costs, while the MG HS opens at $33,990. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $7,390.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $29,260 and $37,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Hyundai Kona by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Kona features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the MG HS gets a 10.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai Kona stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the MG HS. The MG HS counters with panoramic roof and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Kona lines up producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a smartstream intelligent variable transmission (ivt) with sequential manual mode to a FWD layout.

The MG HS responds with a Petrol making 125kW and 275Nm, paired to a 7-speed dct driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.6 seconds.

The MG HS has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Kona measures 4,205mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 450mm shorter than the MG HS at 4,655mm (2,765mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 374L in the Hyundai Kona and 507L in the MG HS, giving the MG HS a 133L advantage.

For towing, the MG HS leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

TightestHyundai Kona KONA 2.0 Atkinson MPi 2WD (OS MY21)Tightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai Kona KONA 2.0 Atkinson MPi 2WD (OS MY21)
10.6mTighter
Best
MG HS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
Hyundai Kona 2.0 Atkinson MPi 2WD (OS MY21)
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MG HS Vibe
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai KonaTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai KonaTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
MG HS11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Hyundai Kona and $1,967/year for the MG HS. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai Kona.

Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Hyundai Kona) vs $1,967 (MG HS). The Hyundai Kona saves you roughly $200 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG HS if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG HS takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Hyundai Kona will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG HS has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona and MG HS?

The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $26,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG HS by $7,390.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai Kona uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG HS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG HS has the largest boot at 507L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG HS makes the most power at 125kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs