CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsPeugeot 5008 vs Skoda Kodiaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Peugeot 5008 vs Skoda Kodiaq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecPeugeotSkoda
Price (RRP)$55,990$54,990
Power100kW110kW
0-100 km/h11.3s9.1s
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space348L270L
Towing750kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 200k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Peugeot 5008 starts from $55,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. That makes the Skoda Kodiaq the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,589 and $60,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

The Skoda Kodiaq holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Peugeot 5008. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Peugeot 5008 and 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Peugeot 5008 and 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq. The Peugeot 5008 adds a 360-degree camera that the Skoda Kodiaq misses.

Feature Showdown

The Peugeot 5008 features a 21-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Peugeot 5008 stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. The Skoda Kodiaq counters with heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Peugeot 5008 gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Kodiaq offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Peugeot 5008 uses a Hybrid producing 100kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.

The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The Skoda Kodiaq has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 100kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kodiaq is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Peugeot 5008 measures 4,790mm long on a 2,895mm wheelbase, 32mm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 5008 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 348L in the Peugeot 5008 and 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq, giving the Peugeot 5008 a 78L advantage.

For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 1,250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.8m

Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4mTighter
Best
Peugeot 5008 Allure Hybrid
11.8m
Worst
Peugeot 5008
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Peugeot 5008 and $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 5008.

Estimated annual total: $1,682 (Peugeot 5008) vs $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq). The Peugeot 5008 saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 5008) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Peugeot 5008 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Kodiaq takes 6 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Peugeot 5008 will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 5008 has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Peugeot 5008 and Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 5008 by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 5008 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 5008 has the largest boot at 348L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Kodiaq makes the most power at 110kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs