Skoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Skoda Kodiaq
From $54,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
140kW
9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
289L

Volvo XC40
From $54,990
SUV
Petrol
2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid
145kW
7.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
460L
Track the Skoda Kodiaq & Volvo XC40
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC40 opens at $54,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $60,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC40 by roughly $2,420 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Volvo XC40 counters with head-up display, wireless charging and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the Volvo XC40 offers textile/leather blend. Climate control is 3-zone in the Skoda Kodiaq and 2-zone in the Volvo XC40.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.
The Volvo XC40 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid making 145kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The Volvo XC40 has the clear power advantage at 145kW vs 140kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 318mm longer than the Volvo XC40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 289L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 460L in the Volvo XC40, giving the Volvo XC40 a 171L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,300kg braked capacity vs 2,100kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.2m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,565/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $2,081/year for the Volvo XC40. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC40.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Volvo XC40 will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC40 has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40?
The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volvo XC40 uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Skoda Kodiaq holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo XC40, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volvo XC40 has the largest boot at 460L.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Volvo XC40 makes the most power at 145kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!





