CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaVolvo
Price (RRP)$54,990$54,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power140kW145kW
0-100 km/h7.9s8.5s
Fuel Economy9.2 L/100km7.3 L/100km
Boot Space289L460L
Towing2,300kg2,100kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Skoda Kodiaq & Volvo XC40

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC40 opens at $54,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $60,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC40 by roughly $2,705 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Skoda Kodiaq packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Volvo XC40.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 7 in the Volvo XC40.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC40 counters with head-up display, wireless charging and Harman Kardon audio that the Skoda Kodiaq does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the Volvo XC40 offers textile/leather blend. Climate control is 3-zone in the Skoda Kodiaq and 2-zone in the Volvo XC40.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.

The Volvo XC40 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid making 145kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Volvo XC40 has the clear power advantage at 145kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 318mm longer than the Volvo XC40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 289L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 460L in the Volvo XC40, giving the Volvo XC40 a 171L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,300kg braked capacity vs 2,100kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

TightestVolvo XC40 Plus B4Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0mTighter
Best
Skoda Kodiaq 140TSI Select
11.2m
Worst
Skoda Kodiaq 140TSI Select
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo XC40Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda Kodiaq11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo XC40Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,622/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $2,081/year for the Volvo XC40. That is a $541 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC40.

Estimated annual total: $2,622 (Skoda Kodiaq) vs $2,081 (Volvo XC40). The Volvo XC40 saves you roughly $541 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Volvo XC40 will save you roughly $541 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC40 has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40?

The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC40 uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo XC40 has the largest boot at 460L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo XC40 makes the most power at 145kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars