CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaVolvo
Price (RRP)$54,990$54,990
Power110kW145kW
0-100 km/h9.1s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km7.3 L/100km
Boot Space270L452L
Towing2,000kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC40 opens at $54,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $60,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kodiaq by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Kodiaq stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Volvo XC40. The Volvo XC40 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the Volvo XC40 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Volvo XC40 responds with a Petrol making 145kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The Volvo XC40 has the clear power advantage at 145kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 318mm longer than the Volvo XC40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 452L in the Volvo XC40, giving the Volvo XC40 a 182L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4m
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $2,081/year for the Volvo XC40. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kodiaq.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq) vs $2,081 (Volvo XC40). The Skoda Kodiaq saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Kodiaq takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Skoda Kodiaq will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC40 has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40?

The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo XC40 has the largest boot at 452L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo XC40 makes the most power at 145kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs