Ford Everest vs Skoda Kodiaq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Ford Everest
From $59,490
SUV
Diesel
Diesel Bi-Turbo
154kW
7.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
259L
Skoda Kodiaq
From $54,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
140kW
9.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
289L
Track the Ford Everest & Skoda Kodiaq
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Everest starts from $59,490 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. That makes the Skoda Kodiaq the more affordable entry point by $4,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,439 and $60,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Everest by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Everest and Skoda Kodiaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Ford Everest and 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Skoda Kodiaq.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Ford Everest and 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Everest features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Everest stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. The Skoda Kodiaq counters with heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Everest gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Kodiaq offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Ford Everest and 3-zone in the Skoda Kodiaq.
Drivetrain
The Ford Everest uses a Diesel Bi-Turbo producing 154kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.
The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 140kW and 320Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kodiaq is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 220mm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 289L in the Skoda Kodiaq, giving the Skoda Kodiaq a 30L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1818L vs 2005L. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,300kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,052/year for the Ford Everest and $2,622/year for the Skoda Kodiaq. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.
Estimated annual total: $2,052 (Ford Everest) vs $2,622 (Skoda Kodiaq). The Ford Everest saves you roughly $570 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Kodiaq takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $4,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Everest and Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the largest boot at 289L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
