CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Mondeo vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mondeo vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Mondeo: we're still completing price, wheelbase, 0-100km/h and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$26,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power177kW114kW
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space557L295L
Towing1,200kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Mondeo & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Mondeo stands out with panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda Mazda3. The Mazda Mazda3 counters with head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Mondeo gets leather accented upholstery while the Mazda Mazda3 offers black cloth.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mondeo uses a 2.0L EcoBoost GTDi, 4-cylinder inline turbo petrol, twin independent variable cam timing producing 177kW and 345Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) driving the front wheels.

The Ford Mondeo has the clear power advantage at 177kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mondeo measures 4,871mm long, 411mm longer than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase).

Boot space is 557L in the Ford Mondeo and 295L in the Mazda Mazda3, giving the Ford Mondeo a 262L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda Mazda3 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.6m

TightestMazda Mazda3 G20 PureTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Ford Mondeo Titanium EcoBoost Hatch (2019 facelift)
11.6m
Worst
Ford Mondeo Titanium EcoBoost Hatch (2019 facelift)
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda Mazda3Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Mondeo11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda3Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Mondeo and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $741 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda3.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford Mondeo) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mondeo if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Mondeo takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda3 will save you roughly $741 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford Mondeo has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Mondeo and Mazda Mazda3?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Mondeo holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda Mazda3, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Mondeo has the largest boot at 557L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Mondeo has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Mondeo makes the most power at 177kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars