Hyundai i30 Hatch vs Suzuki Swift
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 21 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$52,500RRP
- with the Suzuki Swift's standard kit: $52,500 (nothing to add)
$23,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Hyundai i30 Hatch & Suzuki Swift
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Hyundai i30 Hatch starts from $52,500 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $23,990. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $28,510.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $57,750 and $26,389 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $6,415 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Hyundai i30 Hatch
- REC-006422 · published 1 Sep 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the fuel pump impeller may become deformed under certain environmental conditions, interrupting the fuel supply.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
- REC-000629 · published 23 Apr 2019Certain batches of sunroof motors had incorrect software installed and may not have an automatic safety stop function.Year range on the notice: 2018
Suzuki Swift
- REC-006262 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
- REC-006259 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
- REC-001268 · published 13 Jun 2019Side airbags, curtain airbags and seatbelt pretensioner may be inadvertently deployed when the rear door is slammed shut.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
- 10 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Hyundai i30 Hatch features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Swift gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Hyundai i30 Hatch stands out with wireless charging and Infinity audio — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Swift. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Hyundai i30 Hatch gets cloth (n sports front seats) upholstery while the Suzuki Swift offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Hyundai i30 Hatch and 1-zone in the Suzuki Swift.
Drivetrain
The Hyundai i30 Hatch uses a 2.0 T-GDi producing 206kW and 392Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.4 seconds.
The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 59.6kW and 109Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.4 seconds.
The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the clear power advantage at 206kW vs 59.6kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Hyundai i30 Hatch is 3.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Hyundai i30 Hatch measures 4,340mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 480mm longer than the Suzuki Swift at 3,860mm (2,450mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i30 Hatch generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 381L in the Hyundai i30 Hatch and 267L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the Hyundai i30 Hatch a 114L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.8m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Hyundai i30 Hatch and $1,140/year for the Suzuki Swift. That is a $1,283 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Hatch) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). The Hyundai i30 Hatch has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Hyundai i30 Hatch if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (67 vs 66). The Hyundai i30 Hatch and Suzuki Swift trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $1,283 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai i30 Hatch has a clear edge. The Hyundai i30 Hatch adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Hyundai i30 Hatch and Suzuki Swift?
The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai i30 Hatch by $28,510.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Suzuki Swift holds a 3-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Hyundai i30 Hatch, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the largest boot at 381L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch makes the most power at 206kW. The Hyundai i30 Hatch is quickest to 100km/h in 9.4s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
